Dawkins, Chopra and The Other Elephant

​I'm going to be brief. I fervently admire both Dr. Dawkins and Dr. Chopra, and their perspectives of the Universe. In fact, they're both quite correct. 

However, our paradigms depend very much on our perceptions. The blind men in this picture for example, may disagree quite passionately about whether they're touching a tree trunk or a piece of rope, or leathery wall. Which one is right? All of them. Which one is wrong? None of them. 

If only these men could accept the notion that there's something factual out there which may be beyond their ability to comprehend. 

Surely it's a little narcissistic to argue that just because you cannot grasp a different perspective, it cannot possibly be true. 

To Dr. Chopra, I would suggest that Consciousness is the progenitor of everything. No molecules or building blocks make up the building blocks of Consciousness, except one: the U Particle. Dr. Chopra, the Universal Model is based on science and logic, and fully embraces most of what you say. 

To Dr. Dawkins, I would sincerely ask you to consider the very real possibility that you're simply more evolved than the zealots you're trying very hard to reason with. If you tried to educate a bunch of baboons, you would perhaps be more successful. Why? Because their faculties just aren't evolved enough to understand. It's as simple as that, so quit beating yourself up. Dr. Dawkins, the Universal Model is based on science and logic, and fully embraces most of what you say as well. 

Your Universe is one Universe, no matter how you look at it. There is no positive vs negative, no good vs evil, no Chopra vs. Dawkins and no right vs wrong. It's all cool (and it's getting cooler all the time by the way). All that you are, is you. You are also someone with whom you disagree, and they are you too. You are all that you observe, and all that observes you is you.

By the way, if either of you are reading this, may I please please please get a signed copy of one of your books? Cheers mate!

---